> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:22 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [jira] Deleted: (STDCXX-33) Implement C++0x
> regular expressions
>
> Eric Lemings wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Eric Lemings
> >> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 2:58 PM
> >> To: '[email protected]'
> >> Subject: RE: [jira] Deleted: (STDCXX-33) Implement C++0x
> >> regular expressions
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 2:30 PM
> >>> To: [email protected]
> >>> Subject: Re: [jira] Deleted: (STDCXX-33) Implement C++0x
> >>> regular expressions
> >>>
> >>> Martin Sebor wrote:
> >>>> Could we move issues instead of deleting them?
> >>> Also, we're still discussing what the plan is WRT how these
> >>> components will be organized so these kinds of changes seem
> >>> premature. In fact, I'm not sure I see why any issues need
> >>> to be deleted or moved. Why can't the existing ones can be
> >>> changed?
> >> They are subtasks and subtasks can't be moved. I tried.
> >
> > Also, subtasks can't be broken down into smaller issues. Some of
> > these issues will likely need to be subdivided into smaller chunks
> > of work.
>
> As a courtesy to the rest of us working on the project it would
> be nice to let us know what restructuring changes you'd like to
> make, and wait for feedback before making them.
I was counting this as feedback:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 12:26 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: TR1/C++0x Jira Issues
>
> > Was there any conclusion on this?
>
> I don't think we concluded anything specific, just that the
> TR1 Jira components will need to be integrated into those
> for their respective sections in C++ 0x.
Did I misinterpret that?
Brad.
