> -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:55 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [jira] Deleted: (STDCXX-33) Implement C++0x > regular expressions > > Eric Lemings wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:22 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [jira] Deleted: (STDCXX-33) Implement C++0x > >> regular expressions > >> > >> Eric Lemings wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Eric Lemings > >>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 2:58 PM > >>>> To: '[email protected]' > >>>> Subject: RE: [jira] Deleted: (STDCXX-33) Implement C++0x > >>>> regular expressions > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 2:30 PM > >>>>> To: [email protected] > >>>>> Subject: Re: [jira] Deleted: (STDCXX-33) Implement C++0x > >>>>> regular expressions > >>>>> > >>>>> Martin Sebor wrote: > >>>>>> Could we move issues instead of deleting them? > >>>>> Also, we're still discussing what the plan is WRT how these > >>>>> components will be organized so these kinds of changes seem > >>>>> premature. In fact, I'm not sure I see why any issues need > >>>>> to be deleted or moved. Why can't the existing ones can be > >>>>> changed? > >>>> They are subtasks and subtasks can't be moved. I tried. > >>> Also, subtasks can't be broken down into smaller issues. Some of > >>> these issues will likely need to be subdivided into smaller chunks > >>> of work. > >> As a courtesy to the rest of us working on the project it would > >> be nice to let us know what restructuring changes you'd like to > >> make, and wait for feedback before making them. Especially > >> deleting issues should be brought up because doing so not only > >> permanently removes them from the database but also breaks any > >> links pointing to such issues. > > > > Jira is pretty smart. It allows you to relink such issues before > > deleting issues so there are no broken links. > > This is now a broken link: > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-33 > > > > > And the issues are still in the database. I just moved them from > > subtasks into individual issues. Or you'd prefer to keep the > > duplicate issues? > > I would prefer us to have a plan before we start moving issues > around or permanently deleting them. > > As it is, the rest of us are left to guess what's happening > with the existing issues, why they're being deleted, why new > ones are being created, or where you plan to stop. If you want > to change/improve things you need to let us in on your plan > ahead of time to make sure your changes don't adversely affect > anyone or that there isn't a better way to go about implementing > them. It's possible that we'd end up doing exactly what you did > in the end. The big difference is that we'd all understand and > (hopefully) agree with what's going on.
Initiative...momentum got the better of me I suppose. :) Sorry. So what is it, in particular, that we all do NOT understand or agree with? I'll clarify if I can... or haven't already. Brad.
