On Aug 31, 2012, at 2:27 PM, "C. Bergström" <cbergst...@pathscale.com> wrote:
> On 09/ 1/12 01:25 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Are you suggesting that FreeBSD does not allow the inclusion of ANY >> ALv2 library under its ports directory? > I'll give you the benefit of the a doubt one more time... > > stdcxx ends up linking against *EVERY* C++ application if it's used in the > default compiler setup. (Which is what I was trying to achieve) That > includes *******GPLv2******** software in ports. Get it? > I notice you did not answer my question... It's a simply question and requires a simple yes or no. Are you suggesting that FreeBSD does not allow the inclusion of ANY ALv2 library under its ports directory? Thx.
