On Sep 20, 2012, at 8:59 PM, Stefan Teleman wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:44 PM, "C. Bergström"
> <cbergst...@pathscale.com> wrote:
>> fencepost comment - The results are based on tools and I don't think he has
>> a large program which actually triggers the conditions.  (Creating one may
>> take quite some time....)
> I do have a program which triggers the race conditions:
> 22.locale.numpunct.mt. Part of the "official" test harness.
> The real reason why they don't want to accept what the instrumentation
> tools are saying is very simple: they don't LIKE reading what the
> tools are saying. So, blame the tools, pretend that "as long as it
> doesn't crash again there's no bug" and hope for the best.

I cannot include an analyzer output as a regression test in the test suite. 

> But I am very glad this is on a public mailing list, so everyone can
> read what's going on here.


Reply via email to