[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15045566#comment-15045566
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1374:
---------------------------------------
Github user d2r commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/925#issuecomment-162637158
#900 is a change of much larger scope, and looking at it just now, there
are two other new problems preventing tests passing successfully. Would it be
better to merge this in ahead of #900, given that it is a change of much
smaller scope, rather than making the test fix wait on other unrelated changes?
> Random test failures on WindowManagerTest
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: STORM-1374
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1374
> Project: Apache Storm
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: storm-core
> Reporter: Jungtaek Lim
> Assignee: Jungtaek Lim
> Priority: Minor
>
> https://travis-ci.org/apache/storm/jobs/94768693
> {code}
> testTimeBasedWindow(backtype.storm.windowing.WindowManagerTest) Time
> elapsed: 0.176 sec <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<100> but was:<0>
> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:743)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:118)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:555)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:542)
> at
> backtype.storm.windowing.WindowManagerTest.testTimeBasedWindow(WindowManagerTest.java:163)
> testTimeBasedWindowExpiry(backtype.storm.windowing.WindowManagerTest) Time
> elapsed: 0.16 sec <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]> but
> was:<[]>
> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:743)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:118)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:144)
> at
> backtype.storm.windowing.WindowManagerTest.testTimeBasedWindowExpiry(WindowManagerTest.java:199)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
