[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15350575#comment-15350575
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1886:
---------------------------------------

Github user arunmahadevan commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1470#discussion_r68537622
  
    --- Diff: 
external/storm-redis/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/redis/state/RedisKeyValueState.java
 ---
    @@ -60,22 +64,23 @@ public RedisKeyValueState(String namespace) {
         }
     
         public RedisKeyValueState(String namespace, JedisPoolConfig 
poolConfig) {
    -        this(namespace, poolConfig, new DefaultStateSerializer<K>(), new 
DefaultStateSerializer<V>());
    +        this(namespace, poolConfig, new DefaultStateSerializer<K>(), new 
DefaultStateSerializer<Optional<V>>());
         }
     
    -    public RedisKeyValueState(String namespace, JedisPoolConfig 
poolConfig, Serializer<K> keySerializer, Serializer<V> valueSerializer) {
    +    public RedisKeyValueState(String namespace, JedisPoolConfig 
poolConfig, Serializer<K> keySerializer, Serializer<Optional<V>> 
valueSerializer) {
             this(namespace, JedisCommandsContainerBuilder.build(poolConfig), 
keySerializer, valueSerializer);
         }
     
         public RedisKeyValueState(String namespace, 
JedisCommandsInstanceContainer jedisContainer,
    -                              Serializer<K> keySerializer, Serializer<V> 
valueSerializer) {
    +                              Serializer<K> keySerializer, 
Serializer<Optional<V>> valueSerializer) {
    --- End diff --
    
    It might be better to keep the Optional internal to the implementation.


> Extend KeyValueState interface with delete method
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STORM-1886
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1886
>             Project: Apache Storm
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Balazs Kossovics
>
> Even if the implementation of checkpointing only uses the get/put methods of 
> the KeyValueState interface, the existance of a delete method could be really 
> useful in the general case.
> I made a first implementation, what do you think about?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to