Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2433
@JessicaLHartog
Thanks for noticing! By the way, I was not aware of the discussion in
storm-mesos, so don't know which works should be done in Storm side, and how
these are coupled with this issue.
As far as I understand in your comment, only concern with this issue is
specifying Supervisor's thrift port, which shouldn't be random in range but
just using specified port. If I understand correctly, the patch already does
that (via configuration), and storm-mesos could launch Supervisor instance with
overriding supervisor thrift port. Makes sense?
cc. @danny0405 FYI.
---
