First of all, thanks Bobby for driving all the Storm 2.0.0 remaining works to make Storm 2.0.0 reach in finish line. Also thanks Taylor to drive release process.
Since it is a major release, I would like to see most of features work so that we don't have regression. Unfortunately some of basic features don't look like working. Not a critical one but it would be better to address it. Here's the details. I'm doing the test as same as other minor releases. I don't have any integration test, and Bobby stated he saw passing integration test (I guess they're internal tests in Oath) so I'd like to rely on this and skip going through testing complete feature set. > source - verify file (signature, MD5, SHA) -- source, tar.gz : OK -- source, zip : OK - extract file -- source, tar.gz : OK -- source, zip : OK - diff-ing extracted files between tar.gz and zip : OK - build source with JDK 8 -- source, tar.gz : OK - build source dist -- source, tar.gz : OK - build binary dist -- source, tar.gz : OK > binary - verify file (signature, MD5, SHA) -- binary, tar.gz : OK -- binary, zip : OK - extract file -- binary, tar.gz : OK -- binary, zip : OK - diff-ing extracted files between tar.gz and zip : OK - launch daemons : OK - run RollingTopWords (local) : OK - run RollingTopWords (remote) : FAIL - activate / deactivate / rebalance / kill : OK - logviewer (worker dir, daemon dir) :OK - change log level : OK - thread dump, heap dump, restart worker : FAIL (Don't work) - log search : topology search doesn't work, deep search work No +1 here but once we fix the worker profile as well as topology log search I would be +1 for next RC. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 9월 22일 (토) 오전 5:34, Bobby Evans <[email protected]>님이 작성: > +1 I rebuilt the code from the git tag and all of the unit/integration > tests passed. I also ran a single node cluster with both some simple > functionality and performance tests and everything looked good. > > On a side note we just deployed a version based off of the same code as > 2.0.0 to staging (think just some packaging differences and a few plugins), > but with the compatibility layer to run older topologies and everything is > looking good so far. > > Thanks, > > Bobby > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 1:25 PM P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc1) > > > > Full list of changes in this release: > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc1/RELEASE_NOTES.html > > > > The tag/commit to be voted upon is v2.0.0: > > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=062bb2f158a66b802a3ad7bdda14fb8f70cf9b88;hb=062bb2f158a66b802a3ad7bdda14fb8f70cf9b88 > > > > The source archive being voted upon can be found here: > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc1/apache-storm-2.0.0-src.tar.gz > > > > Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc1/ > > > > The release artifacts are signed with the following key: > > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd > > > > The Nexus staging repository for this release is: > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1070 > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0. > > > > When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release. > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0 > > [ ] 0 No opinion > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > > > > Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release. > > > > -Taylor > > >
