If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate. -Taylor
> On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, saurabh mimani <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers? > > > > Best Regards > > Saurabh Kumar Mimani > > > > > On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0. >> >>> Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans <[email protected]>: >>> >>> I think all of the blockers are in now. Please take a look and >> hopefully, >>> we can get a release out soon. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Bobby >>> >>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been heads >>> down >>>> on a different project for a while before that. I'll respond to the >>> JIRA. >>>> I am happy to let it go in. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Bobby >>>> >>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing < >>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question ( >>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136) >>>> regarding >>>>> whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going with >>> it, >>>>> so I didn't want to merge prematurely. >>>>> >>>>> I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's >> waiting >>>> for >>>>> STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code. >>>>> >>>>> Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik >>>>> <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>>> Sounds like - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913 >>> (STORM-3290) >>>>> is >>>>>> merged - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276) >> is >>>>>> nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. - >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 (STORM-2990, >> STORM-3279) >>>>>> appears ready to be committed ? >>>>>> >>>>>> and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 - (STORM-2720) >>>> seems a >>>>>> bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on. >>>>>> >>>>>> -roshan >>>>>> On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde >> Døssing >>> < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I would like to get at least >>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913 >>>>>> (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 >>>>>> (regression) in. >>>>>> >>>>>> I think it would be nice to also get >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a >>> hurry >>>>> they >>>>>> could go in the next release. >>>>>> >>>>>> Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche < >>>>>> [email protected]>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi devs, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of >>> when >>>>> it >>>>>>> could happen? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Julien >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.digitalpebble.com >>>>>>> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>> #digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
