+1
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Friday, January 4, 2019, 9:02 PM, Ethan Li <ethanopensou...@gmail.com> wrote: +1 on this Ethan Li > On Jan 4, 2019, at 20:19, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate. > > -Taylor > >> On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, saurabh mimani <mimani.saur...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers? >> >> >> >> Best Regards >> >> Saurabh Kumar Mimani >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing <stigdoess...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0. >>> >>>> Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans <bo...@apache.org>: >>>> >>>> I think all of the blockers are in now. Please take a look and >>> hopefully, >>>> we can get a release out soon. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Bobby >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans <bo...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been heads >>>> down >>>>> on a different project for a while before that. I'll respond to the >>>> JIRA. >>>>> I am happy to let it go in. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Bobby >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing < >>>> stigdoess...@gmail.com >>>>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question ( >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136) >>>>> regarding >>>>>> whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going with >>>> it, >>>>>> so I didn't want to merge prematurely. >>>>>> >>>>>> I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's >>> waiting >>>>> for >>>>>> STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code. >>>>>> >>>>>> Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik >>>>>> <roshan_n...@yahoo.com.invalid>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Sounds like - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913 >>>> (STORM-3290) >>>>>> is >>>>>>> merged - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276) >>> is >>>>>>> nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. - >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 (STORM-2990, >>> STORM-3279) >>>>>>> appears ready to be committed ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 - (STORM-2720) >>>>> seems a >>>>>>> bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -roshan >>>>>>> On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde >>> Døssing >>>> < >>>>>>> stigdoess...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would like to get at least >>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913 >>>>>>> (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 >>>>>>> (regression) in. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think it would be nice to also get >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a >>>> hurry >>>>>> they >>>>>>> could go in the next release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche < >>>>>>> lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi devs, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of >>>> when >>>>>> it >>>>>>>> could happen? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Julien >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.digitalpebble.com >>>>>>>> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>>> #digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>
