+1 Den lør. 5. jan. 2019 kl. 07.42 skrev Govind Menon < [email protected]>:
> +1 > > On Jan 4, 2019 23:46, "Roshan Naik" <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > > > On Friday, January 4, 2019, 9:02 PM, Ethan Li <[email protected]> > wrote: > > +1 on this > > Ethan Li > > > On Jan 4, 2019, at 20:19, P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate. > > > > -Taylor > > > >> On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, saurabh mimani <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers? > >> > >> > >> > >> Best Regards > >> > >> Saurabh Kumar Mimani > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0. > >>> > >>>> Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans <[email protected] > >: > >>>> > >>>> I think all of the blockers are in now. Please take a look and > >>> hopefully, > >>>> we can get a release out soon. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> > >>>> Bobby > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been > heads > >>>> down > >>>>> on a different project for a while before that. I'll respond to the > >>>> JIRA. > >>>>> I am happy to let it go in. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> > >>>>> Bobby > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing < > >>>> [email protected] > >>>>>> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question ( > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136) > >>>>> regarding > >>>>>> whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going > with > >>>> it, > >>>>>> so I didn't want to merge prematurely. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's > >>> waiting > >>>>> for > >>>>>> STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik > >>>>>> <[email protected]>: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Sounds like - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913 > >>>> (STORM-3290) > >>>>>> is > >>>>>>> merged - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276) > >>> is > >>>>>>> nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. - > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 (STORM-2990, > >>> STORM-3279) > >>>>>>> appears ready to be committed ? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 - (STORM-2720) > >>>>> seems a > >>>>>>> bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -roshan > >>>>>>> On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde > >>> Døssing > >>>> < > >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I would like to get at least > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913 > >>>>>>> (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 > >>>>>>> (regression) in. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I think it would be nice to also get > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a > >>>> hurry > >>>>>> they > >>>>>>> could go in the next release. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche < > >>>>>>> [email protected]>: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi devs, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of > >>>> when > >>>>>> it > >>>>>>>> could happen? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Julien > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering* > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> http://www.digitalpebble.com > >>>>>>>> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ > >>>>>>>> #digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> >
