Never mind… just found it.

On Mar 20, 2014, at 5:09 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]> wrote:

> Derek do you have an idea for a fix?
> 
> On Mar 20, 2014, at 3:43 PM, Derek Dagit <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>>> As I said above, this fix is the most important in my opinion.
>>> STORM-259 (Random#nextInt) is new to me -- can't say whether it's as
>>> important as STORM-187 or not.
>> 
>> Yeah, we found it recently, and I created it this morning after reading 
>> Taylor's mail.
>> 
>> STORM-187 can be a problem with fewer than 30 retries (likelihood depends on 
>> configuration), but we will hit STORM-259 when retries exceeds 30.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Derek
>> 
>> On 3/20/14, 14:18, Michael G. Noll wrote:
>>> On my side the most important change is, as you point out, STORM-187.
>>> The primary reason is like Adam Lewis is pointing out because it's a
>>> stability problem.  The secondary aspect is that this issue taints the
>>> new Netty backend, and at least IMHO the faster Storm could confidently
>>> bury ZeroMQ the better. :-)
>>> 
>>> As I said above, this fix is the most important in my opinion.
>>> STORM-259 (Random#nextInt) is new to me -- can't say whether it's as
>>> important as STORM-187 or not.
>>> 
>>> Switching to my non-essential wishlist I'd also +1 STORM-252 (Upgrade
>>> Curator and thus ZooKeeper to 3.4.5).  We have been running ZK 3.4.5
>>> anyway for a couple of reasons, and it would be nice to have official
>>> Storm support for the latest ZK version (ok, the recently released ZK
>>> 3.4.6 is actually the latest but hey).  Although I don't know how
>>> confident we are that the code in STORM-252 actually works, i.e. whether
>>> integrating STORM-252 into 0.9.2 on such short notice would be jumping
>>> the gun or a safe move.
>>> 
>>>  Btw, in terms of Storm/Kafka integration Kafka is in the same boat:
>>> it's built against ZK 3.3.x, and LinkedIn recommends the use of ZK 3.3.4
>>> in the docs.  There's an open ticket KAFKA-854 [1] that's basically the
>>> equivalent of STORM-252, but I'm not sure how actively the Kafka team is
>>> working on that.
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Michael
>>> 
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-854
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 03/20/2014 02:33 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
>>>> I'd like to get this discussion started, largely because the "negative 
>>>> timeout" bug (STORM-187) really bothers me. I've not seen it in the wild, 
>>>> but I've heard of a few cases where it was enough to hinder upgrading.
>>>> 
>>>> HEAD looks good to me at the moment, with the major difference being the 
>>>> zookeeper update and the patch mentioned above.
>>>> 
>>>> Any thoughts on other PRs or patches to include?
>>>> 
>>>> -Taylor
>>> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to