On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Devs, > > Which approach is correct? If I want to host ruby apps, I would deploy it > on web servers such as Passenger, Puma and Thin. > > IMO, we should make these web servers as cartridges instead of making ruby > as a cartridge. If we do so, we can have many web servers up and running > which can host ruby apps. Users can select one according to their wish. > > Also, we can get an additional advantage. We can host different apps in > the same server as well. For example, If we make a passenger server > cartridge, we will be able to host ruby, python and nodejs apps. > > Yes, ruby, php, node.js ..etc need a webservers to get run time. IMO, we should bundle these web servers with ruby..etc and make deferent cartridges. For example many people used passenger for ruby. Likewise apache for PHP. IMO we should make some common combination. But any one can create what they want. > I found a passenger puppet module from puppet forge[1] (I am using it to > make a passenger cartridge now). > > WDYT? > > Appreciate your suggestions. > > 1. https://forge.puppetlabs.com/puppetlabs/passenger > > Thanks. > > -- > Rajkumar Rajaratnam > Software Engineer | WSO2, Inc. > Mobile +94777568639 | +94783498120 > -- Lakmal Warusawithana Vice President, Apache Stratos Director - Cloud Architecture; WSO2 Inc. Mobile : +94714289692 Blog : http://lakmalsview.blogspot.com/
