Hi Raj, +1 for the suggested name
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Lakmal Warusawithana <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Lakmal, Udara, >> >> Yes *Ruby+Passenger Cartridge* looks better than Passenger Cartridge. >> >> I need a little clarification. >> >> AFAIK, we can also host python and nodejs applications in passenger >> server, not just ruby apps. That is why I called it as passenger cartridge, >> in general. >> >> I assume we are going to make separate passenger cartridges for python >> and nodejs >> >> We can call them *Ruby+Passenger, **Python+Passenger* and so on. >> > > +1 > > >> >> @Udara >> This is a just an argument to have a good name to our cartridges. At the >> end of the day, we are going to do the same thing. Sorry if this thread was >> misleading you :) >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:17 PM, Lakmal Warusawithana <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Udara, >>>> >>>> Yes we are installing ruby there! >>>> >>>> Did you notice the below section in the passenger node definition in my >>>> previous reply? :) >>>> >>>> class { 'ruby': >>>> version => '1.8.7', >>>> gems_version => '1.8.24', >>>> rubygems_update => false, >>>> } >>>> >>>> This snippet will install specified ruby version and gems. >>>> >>>> My suggestion was to make server cartridges instead of ruby cartridge. >>>> >>>> What clients need is a server to host ruby application, not just ruby. >>>> >>>> IMO, it better to call them as a passenger cartridge or a puma >>>> cartridge (Not a ruby cartridge). >>>> >>>> >>> IMO, we should call Ruby+Passenger Cartridge. Generally people are >>> writting ruby apps not Passenger apps IMO. >>> >>> >>>> Isn't it? >>>> >>>> Otherwise, we are installing ruby also there. >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Udara Liyanage <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Raj, >>>>> >>>>> As I understood, Your suggestion is to make a Passenger cartridge >>>>> instead of Ruby cartridge. If a Passenger cartridge is created don't we >>>>> install Ruby on it. Client's requirement is a Ruby environment where he >>>>> can >>>>> deploy Ruby apps. Sorry if I have misunderstood. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Touched, not typed. Erroneous words are a feature, not a typo. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Rajkumar Rajaratnam >>>> Software Engineer | WSO2, Inc. >>>> Mobile +94777568639 | +94783498120 >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Lakmal Warusawithana >>> Vice President, Apache Stratos >>> Director - Cloud Architecture; WSO2 Inc. >>> Mobile : +94714289692 >>> Blog : http://lakmalsview.blogspot.com/ >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Rajkumar Rajaratnam >> Software Engineer | WSO2, Inc. >> Mobile +94777568639 | +94783498120 >> > > > > -- > Lakmal Warusawithana > Vice President, Apache Stratos > Director - Cloud Architecture; WSO2 Inc. > Mobile : +94714289692 > Blog : http://lakmalsview.blogspot.com/ > > -- Udara Liyanage Software Engineer WSO2, Inc.: http://wso2.com lean. enterprise. middleware web: http://udaraliyanage.wordpress.com phone: +94 71 443 6897
