I am -0 on logins. Correcting malicious changes to the pages hopefully won't be to hard as long as there is a history trail we can roll back to. Also if a login account only requires a verified email account, if someone wanted to hack the page, they would still do it. Where it would get hard to police would be if small incremental changes were made over time.
-Rob > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2004 04:27 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Should we require wiki logins? > > Seeing the first wiki change notification messages today, I realise that > logging in to the wiki is not required before making changes. In such cases, > all we get is an IP address as an indication of who made the changes. > > I'm not entirely sure if this is possible, but if the wiki can be configured > to require logins, then should we make it so, so that we can have some idea > of who is doing what? I think that would be good, but wanted to see how > others feel before I go ahead and make a request of the infra folks. > > WDYT? > > -- > Martin Cooper > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
