The package name follows the Shale and really Jakarta convention where
the TLP (Struts and Jakarta respectively) isn't included in the package
name. As for there being "one true Struts 2.0", I believe that idea has
gone by the wayside. It might be possible someday to merge Shale and
Action, but at this point, I don't think anyone has a way forward on
that. We did discuss collaborating better between Action and Shale in
areas like annotations, workflow, etc.
Don
Joe Germuska wrote:
At 11:36 AM -0800 12/21/05, Don Brown wrote:
As we discovered further at ApacheCon this year, there is a lot of
confusion as to what Struts is and where it is going. The story that
I think we are all in agreement is Struts has two separate but equal
frameworks - Action and Shale. To avoid further confusion, I propose
we rename Struts Ti to Struts Action 2.0 Proposal, while keeping the
Ti as the code name. I think we should be clear that Ti is not some
"third" framework, but a candidate for Action 2.0.
This proposal involves:
- Renaming the package from org.apache.ti to org.apache.action
is this right? org.apache.action ?
shouldn't struts be in there somewhere?
this seems to be a little at odds with some previously stated
explanations of how the "one true Struts 2.0" will emerge, but
frankly, I'm not sure I think that's a problem.
Joe
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
