A few weeks ago, my reaction would have definitely been no, Struts
Action is the project and there are two versions. However, as Action 2
has moved along, and we've migrated resources like the wiki, jira, and
Action 1 to Maven 2, I'm starting if you might not be on to something.
Just from an SVN and JIRA perspective, it is much more natural to treat
them as two different projects, and I'd argue from a user and website
perspective as well.
I think the project names should remain the same, but from a project
management perspective, I'm starting to agree with you they should be
clearly separate. Keeping Action 1 and Action 2 as the names is
important as it conveys progress, migration, and similar goals, however,
I think we would be better off to treat them as to separate projects.
Don
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
On Wed, April 26, 2006 11:20 am, Don Brown said:
So again, there is much to do and please do join the efforts. If there
is something we can do to help make the project direction clearer, or
highlight areas that need work, please let us know. These are the types
of non-code discussions I feel are appropriate for this list as their
end result is more commits and technical involvement.
Don, can I make one suggestion here, or actually, ask a question first?
And if by chance it is already the case, I'd like to see it communicated
much clearer.
What is the status of Action1? What I mean is, what is its standing with
relation to SAF2 and Shale? At this point in time, under the Struts
umbrella, do we have three projects (Action1, SAF2 and Shale) or two
(Action and Shale)?
Looking at the web site, the later appears to be the case. If that is NOT
currently the case, I believe it should be communicated much clearer,
beginning with how it is shown on the Struts site.
If that IS the case, I'd like to suggest that there be three separate
projects under Struts. If Action1 were allowed to be a separate project
under Struts, and maybe we call it Struts Classic (I was against this name
some time ago, but I think it makes sense now), I think there would be a
lot less anxiety out there about its fate. It could continue to evolve on
its own, and people could target their contributions to one or the other.
Frank
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
