On Wed, April 26, 2006 11:20 am, Don Brown said: > So again, there is much to do and please do join the efforts. If there > is something we can do to help make the project direction clearer, or > highlight areas that need work, please let us know. These are the types > of non-code discussions I feel are appropriate for this list as their > end result is more commits and technical involvement.
Don, can I make one suggestion here, or actually, ask a question first? And if by chance it is already the case, I'd like to see it communicated much clearer. What is the status of Action1? What I mean is, what is its standing with relation to SAF2 and Shale? At this point in time, under the Struts umbrella, do we have three projects (Action1, SAF2 and Shale) or two (Action and Shale)? Looking at the web site, the later appears to be the case. If that is NOT currently the case, I believe it should be communicated much clearer, beginning with how it is shown on the Struts site. If that IS the case, I'd like to suggest that there be three separate projects under Struts. If Action1 were allowed to be a separate project under Struts, and maybe we call it Struts Classic (I was against this name some time ago, but I think it makes sense now), I think there would be a lot less anxiety out there about its fate. It could continue to evolve on its own, and people could target their contributions to one or the other. Frank --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
