>From: "Dakota Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>
> You are right, for once. I only speak for myself. Those who are 
> unwilling to listen to others are condemned by their own choice to a 
> life of ignorance. 
>

Sheese, sorry this got your panties in a bunch.

 
> On 5/21/06, Kimani Darisha wrote: 
> > To anyone following these thread, please ignore this fool. He does 
> > not speak for anyone, and is only here to confuse people. 
> > 
> > K. 
> > 
> > On 5/21/06, Dakota Jack wrote: 
> > > I have seen no "very popular need". This is like Bush-Speak. Baloney 
> > > parading as truth. 
> > > 
> > > On 5/21/06, Don Brown wrote: 
> > > > 
> > > > After talking with several on this list about the possibility of 
> > > > combining the best of JSF and Action 2 in a unified framework from a 
> > > > user perspective, I have completed a first cut at JSF support in Action 
> > > > 2 with this loftly goal. 
> > > > 
> > > > From a user perspective, you still have one configuration file, 
> > > > struts-action.xml, which maps urls to actions and actions to results. 
> > > > However, you can optionally include the JSF interceptor stack and use 
> > > > the JSF result, allowing you to use JSF components in the view. You 
> > > > still define alternative results the same way, still have an action 
> > > > class per url, and can still use the normal GET-style navigation. 
> > > > 
> > > > From a framework perspective, I split the lifecycle class into 
> > > > indivudal Action 2 interceptors, one per phase. The final render phase 
> > > > I turned into a Result. Upon initialization, I replace the navigation 
> > > > handler with one that simply records outcomes as if they were result 
> > > > codes from an Action. Also, the setup inserts a variable resolver that 
> > > > exposes the action instance to the EL bindings. Therefore, the flow 
> > > > goes: determine action/namespace -> run normal interceptors -> run JSF 
> > > > phases -> invoke JSF action (optional) -> invoke SAF2 action -> invoke 
> > > > render phase. The purpose of the Action then becomes as a general setup 
> > > > for the page, much like the Shale pre-render hook. 
> > > > 
> > > > I chose this approach because I find the Action 2 controller stronger 
> > > > (JSF was always meant as a view tech, as I understand it), so think it 
> > > > better suited for navigation, state-less actions, and centralizing page 
> > > > setup code. JSF is better for complex single pages or page groups where 
> > > > different stateful components might be needing to submit the page 
> > > > without affecting others. 
> > > > 
> > > > To demonstrate this integration, I added a JSF tab to the showcase. As 
> > > > a sneak peek, here is the action mapping for a JSF page that edits an 
> > > > employee: 
> > > > 
> > > > > > > > class="org.apache.struts.action2.showcase.jsf.EmployeeAction"> 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > index 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Notice the default page is the JSF page, but other navigation is 
> > > > handled 
> > > > by traditional Action 2 results. Incidently, this means only POSTs for 
> > > > real form submits and bookmarkable GETS everywhere else. 
> > > > 
> > > > I'm sure there is a lot of refinement to do, but I'm hoping this 
> > > > general 
> > > > approach will solve the very popular need to combine the two frameworks 
> > > > in a seamless way for the user. I'm particularly interested in feedback 
> > > > from the JSF folks, as I'm pretty new to the framework. 
> > > > 
> > > > Don 
> > > > 
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." 
> > > ~Dakota Jack~ 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." 
> ~Dakota Jack~ 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 

Reply via email to