The obvious truth is so easy to state. Thanks, Tim. On 6/21/06, Tim O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...we're dealing with the ramifications of dismantling Jakarta from years ago. I actually think that this situation would have never arose if Struts and Shale were two sibling subprojects in a larger Jakarta project. But, the Board spoke years ago, and umbrella projects were broken up because of oversight concens. This highly dormant non-member votes TLP for Shale. This isn't meant as a slight towards Craig, rather I think that separating Shale into separate entity will help clarify the message of both Shale and SAF2. Otherwise every Shale page on the site is like an if/else clause "Use SAF2 if you like actions, but use shale if you...". I take a look at the db.apache.orgTLP, and I don't wish that fate upon Shale. Shale should be a TLP, the Shale site should be self-hosting. Struts is a TLP, the Struts site should be self-hosting. There is obviously a good deal of exchange, but the frameworks "compete" (not my words). On 6/21/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 6/21/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If that means a (hopefully amicable) divorce, then so be it. > > If that's what the people working on Shale want, I doubt that the PMC > would oppose a change of venue. > > If that is the case, then the next question would be whether Shale > would be a better fit as a top-level ASF project, a subproject of > MyFaces, or somewhere else entirely? > > -Ted. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~
