What is the problem? Who caused it? Bingo! Eureka?
On 6/21/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paul Benedict wrote: > I don't see the point in bundling Shale into a "Struts 2.0" distribution. No > offense to anyone who develops Shale, but when we have packages called > "action2", it makes it pretty clear Shale is not Struts 2.0 -- only the action > framework. Separate frameworks, imo, get different names and distributions. I am > not offended Shale is within the Struts community, but I do not see it as the > torch bearer to the name Struts -- I do see that with the AF, which historically > holds the name. Again, Struts Action and Struts Shale would both retain their separate projects, codebases, and release cycles. Struts 2.0 is about building something on top of our Struts efforts to create a unified front to users. Users don't care about all the little projects, subprojects, and libraries we have; I think they just want something to help them build webapps - they want Struts 2.0. And as a committer, PMC member and Struts user, I want it too. Don --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~
