On 6/22/06, Hubert Rabago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/22/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is going to be short, both because I'm on a deadline and because
> I think the important points have already been covered.
>
> I'm not in favor of distributing Shale as a library behind a Struts 2
> that promotes the Action 2 controller. Shale's story from the
> beginning has been that it is based on JSF.
>
> Where is lives is less of a concern, but I'd be happy either as a TLP
> or as part of MyFaces. I'm very glad that Shale was accepted here
> and given time to grow and develop a community, but I think it's time
> to find a new home. I'd like to see Struts (the project) return to a
> focus on building a great Action framework, and let Shale continue to
> explore what can be done with JSF.
>
> --
> Wendy
Thanks, Wendy, for finding the words I needed to express my own view!
Now I won't have to write them up.
I'm +1 to Wendy's views above. All of them. (Yes, I'm on a deadline, too).
Hubert
+1
Whatever happens to Shale, I hope that Struts project does not mutate
to a simple "Struts == SAF2" equation; I want to be sure that SAF1 is
kept alive as well. I know that to keep it alive someone (like me) has
to make it happen by submitting new code. I am going to, I do work on
it.
In the meantime I want to make sure that SAF1 will not be simply
removed from source repository just because SAF2 is the official
future. I also hope that discussing improvements to SAF1 in dev list
will not be considered mauvais ton.
Michael.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
