So, before it was
wwurl
and now it woud be
surl
Hmmm, I don't know that {surl} is much worse that {wwurl} :)
Are we *required* to map directly from the JSP prefix to the Velocity
"prefix", or is that just a convention?
If we had some lattitude, I might suggest
svurl
as the Velcocity "prefix", as in Struts Velocity, but I don't know
that we'd want to retrofit that convention to the JSP tags.
What's the deal with FreeMarker? Do we have a similar problem there?
-Ted.
On 7/18/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, I know we already had this discussion, and the general consensus,
IIRC, was to use "s:" to replace "saf:". However, this doesn't work so
well when it comes to the Velocity tags. In that case, the prefix
doesn't have the "." separator, so instead of "s:url", you have "surl",
and I'm not sure that's what we want :)
The other possibility is to use "s2", although I hate to tie the number
2 in where we don't have to. Any ideas?
Don
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
