I'm using Tag, and TagAttribute. I need to know on what package you are
going to place them, but we can do that later.
musachy
Rene Gielen wrote:
Musachy,
Rene
I'm getting familiar with apt, if you can replace the
javadocs with
annotations it would be nice (read: spare me the
regexs :)), I think
nothing is using them right now so it won't break
anything.
musachy
Yes, should be safe to remove them.
We have to define the naming / annotation keywords, then we could kick this off
(and out) ;)
Regards,
Rene
Ted Husted wrote:
If you and Musachy would like to work this out,
Rene, that would great.
I've quite a bit on my plate already with bringing
the MailReader up
to speed with all the other excellent changes we've
made this month.
-Ted.
On 11/16/06, Rene Gielen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Ted, Musachy, others,
I remember this ticket... :-/
Got stuck with maven2 last time I looked into it,
before with my
daytime business catched me again.
The ww taglib xdoclet generation was a hack of the
original tld
generation stuff from xdoclet1, and that is one of
the reasons why it
was that hard to integrate in the new maven build
system.
I would really vote for switching apt, too.
Annotations is one of the
best improvements tiger introduced, und using apt
would give us true
flexibility while dropping build dependencies. And
it is "standard".
For the conversion of javadoc comments to
annotations, this would be
pretty easy to do with Idea, some nice regexp
replacements & some
sensible review. I could offer my help on this,
cause next week I've
got some time left :) Btw, we should also
remember the html
artifacts produced by the tld generation, needed
for snippet based
documentation.
Regards,
Rene
Since we haven't had any takers on fixing the
XDoclet
processing, I
doubt that anyone is married to the XDoclet
approach.
Meanwhile, other
new features are embracing annotations, so I
would
suggest that
annotations would actually be better than the
old
XDoclet approach.
After all, XDoclet is basically a precursor to
annotations.
So, if you want to work on an APT patch for
WW-1392,
I'll review it.
-Ted.
On 11/16/06, Musachy Barroso
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I was playing with apt
(http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/apt/Getting
Started.html)
today and it is pretty easy to use, I could
get the
tld generation
working in a few days, the only thing is that
we
would have to use
annotations instead of javadoc comments, would
that
be a problem?
musachy
Musachy Barroso wrote:
Could we use apt?
musachy
Ted Husted wrote:
On 11/15/06, Musachy Barroso
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is anything going to be done for the TLD
generation or we are just
going
to update it by hand (that's what I've
been
doing anyway) for now?
We'd like to go back to using XDoclet, but
need
to workaround
XDoclet's incompatbility with J5.
*
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1392
-Ted.
------------------------------------------------------
---------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------
---------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=49702&messageID=102061#102061
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
