When we started the taglib generation in ww2, we had to tweak the xdoclet 
templates and a little bit of code because the meta information had to be in 
the component sources rather than the Tag-classes. Because of the dual use of 
the components (fm-support), the real logic sits there while the Tag classes 
are simple wrappers. Also I remenber there were some small issues with html 
artifact generation. We could not get xdoclet to go without tweaking it.

Maybe Konstantin could bring some light into whether standard xd2 taglib doclet 
would deliver this flexibility. Also, the idea of using real annotations, while 
doing generation with xd2, does not sound that bad, if it would help us to get 
things out the door more quickly.

BTW, I did not find much on apt based tld generation, too ...

Regards,
Rene

> If the xdoclet 2 project already has a taglib module,
> I'd rather use 
> that.  Is there any technical reason we would need to
> have our own 
> custom taglib generation module?
> 
> Don
> 
> Konstantin Priblouda wrote:
> > --- Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >   
> >> Surely, we can't be the first project interested
> in
> >> using annotations to 
> >> generate taglib tld's?  Is there any other
> solution
> >> out there we can 
> >> leverage?
> >>     
> >
> > Hi Don,  you have several options out of the box:
> > 1. XD2 has working taglib module, maven2 plugin,
> and
> > fresh version of qdox parser (1.6.1) is said to
> work
> > with 1.5 sources - just add plugin invocation to
> your
> > pom.xml
> >
> > If you like to go for annotations, there is
> posibility
> > to create metadata provider which would pull the
> same
> > metadata from  annotations instead of @tags and
> > utilize the same templates. 
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > ----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de
> ]----------------
> > Still using XDoclet 1.x?  XDoclet 2 is released and
> of production quality.
> > check it out: http://xdoclet.codehaus.org
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> ______________________________________________________
> ______________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail
> beta.
> > http://new.mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >   
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=49702&messageID=102084#102084


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to