So, if we're dependant on this version of struts-annotations, I'm thinking we should tag it too. I deployed it at r498040. Just not sure what to call it.
STRUTS_2_0_3_STRUTS-ANNOTATIONS ? -T On 1/19/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/19/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/19/07, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok, cool, maybe it has been fixed. Well, I deployed the snapshot so > > hopefully this doesn't happen again. > > When I tried it clean, without deploying the struts-annotations > separately, it did not generate the TLD. > > When I tried it clean again, with deploying the struts-annotations > first, it did generate the TLD, but I don't see the TLD in the JAR. > > I'll try the HEAD with the in-place JAR to see if that gets bundled. OK, against the head the TLD is included. To move forward, I'll re-tag against the head, and run 2.0.3. As they say, the third time is the charm :) -Ted.
-- HTH, Ted. * http://www.husted.com/struts/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
