To make sure everything is reviewed, I look for the tickets without a fix version set (which maps to "unknown"), and then set the ticket to an upcoming milestone or a release series, or to Future. I don't consider Future the horizon, but beyond the horizon. The horizon is the numbered versions. If something is set to unknown (no fix version), then I know the ticket hasn't been reviewed.
On 2/18/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JIRA does not take the synonym to heart. JIRA provides an actual "Unknown" version which can be assigned to issues. If they are assigned to anything else, they appear on the road map. That's why it's better to put them to Unknown than Future, to indicate a horizon versus yonder. Paul Ted Husted wrote: > I wouldn't characterize "future" as meaning on the horizon for > implementation. We've been using it as a synonym for unknown. > > -Ted. > > On 2/16/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> There are 30 issues sitting under "Future", and I believe this is >> incorrect because it means they are on the horizon for implementation. >> Instead, I will probably go through and change them to version "Unknown" >> unless there is a really good chance someone will be addressing them. >> I'll wait until Sunday for feedback. Thanks. >> >> Paul
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
