On 2/19/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To make sure everything is reviewed, I look for the tickets without a fix version set (which maps to "unknown"), and then set the ticket to an upcoming milestone or a release series, or to Future. I don't consider Future the horizon, but beyond the horizon. The horizon is the numbered versions. If something is set to unknown (no fix version), then I know the ticket hasn't been reviewed.
Right. And in fact that was the basis upon which the version values in JIRA were created, when we moved from Bugzilla. There's a fairly lengthy discussion of this in the archives, for anyone who cares to delve into the rationale more deeply. -- Martin Cooper On 2/18/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> JIRA does not take the synonym to heart. JIRA provides an actual > "Unknown" version which can be assigned to issues. If they are assigned > to anything else, they appear on the road map. That's why it's better to > put them to Unknown than Future, to indicate a horizon versus yonder. > > Paul > > Ted Husted wrote: > > I wouldn't characterize "future" as meaning on the horizon for > > implementation. We've been using it as a synonym for unknown. > > > > -Ted. > > > > On 2/16/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> There are 30 issues sitting under "Future", and I believe this is > >> incorrect because it means they are on the horizon for implementation. > >> Instead, I will probably go through and change them to version "Unknown" > >> unless there is a really good chance someone will be addressing them. > >> I'll wait until Sunday for feedback. Thanks. > >> > >> Paul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
