I'm fine with making the docs cover 2.1 only, but we should at least preserve the old docs for users and so we can update them if we need to make any more security/patch releases.
Don On 8/3/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The cloning would be useful if we were going to maintain both branches > for an indefinite period. Perhaps the underlying question is whether > we plan to continue to extend 2.0.x once the 2.1.x release series is > in play. > > Regardless of whether we are using a wiki as an editor, as to the > documentation generally, it would be a good idea to note the first > release for a new feature (as of 2.1.0), as well as when significant > changes to existing features were made. > > If no one is itching for another 2.0.x release, then perhaps it's time > to declare that the development documentation relates to the 2.1.x > head. > > So, what's still keeping us from a 2.1.0 beta? > > -Ted. > > On 8/2/07, Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I always missed such a feature. > > For 2.1 vs. 2.0, this would help to keep proper documentation. The > > downside of branching is that common doc entries have to be applied > > twice, which requires discipline and might havd a negative impact on > > overall doc quality. For the codebase, svn / diff / commit mails make > > branches much easier to maintain... > > > > Don Brown schrieb: > > > For a FedEx day project, one of the Confluence guys created a plugin > > > that allowed you to clone/tag/branch a space. We might want to do the > > > same if new branches significantly differ from the previous. > > > > > > http://blogs.atlassian.com/developer/2007/05/fedex_v_copy_space_plugin.html > > > > > > Don > > > > > > On 8/2/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> That's probably not a good idea, as the ajax-related tags changed > > >> quite a bit on 2.1 now the documentation is pointing to them. > > >> > > >> musachy > > >> > > >> On 8/2/07, Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> Actual value is > > >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/struts2/trunk/core/src/site/resources/tags/ > > >>> > > >>> Musachy Barroso schrieb: > > >>>> is the "struts2-tags" cwiki variable pointing to svn trunk or the > > >>>> branch? > > >>>> > > >>>> musachy > > >>>> > > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > -- > > Rene Gielen | http://it-neering.net/ > > Aachen | PGP-ID: BECB785A > > Germany | gielen at it-neering.net > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > HTH, Ted <http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
