We bundle the HTML versions with the distribution, and we could hack those if something came up.
On 8/3/07, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm fine with making the docs cover 2.1 only, but we should at least > preserve the old docs for users and so we can update them if we need > to make any more security/patch releases. > > Don > > On 8/3/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The cloning would be useful if we were going to maintain both branches > > for an indefinite period. Perhaps the underlying question is whether > > we plan to continue to extend 2.0.x once the 2.1.x release series is > > in play. > > > > Regardless of whether we are using a wiki as an editor, as to the > > documentation generally, it would be a good idea to note the first > > release for a new feature (as of 2.1.0), as well as when significant > > changes to existing features were made. > > > > If no one is itching for another 2.0.x release, then perhaps it's time > > to declare that the development documentation relates to the 2.1.x > > head. > > > > So, what's still keeping us from a 2.1.0 beta? > > > > -Ted. > > > > On 8/2/07, Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I always missed such a feature. > > > For 2.1 vs. 2.0, this would help to keep proper documentation. The > > > downside of branching is that common doc entries have to be applied > > > twice, which requires discipline and might havd a negative impact on > > > overall doc quality. For the codebase, svn / diff / commit mails make > > > branches much easier to maintain... > > > > > > Don Brown schrieb: > > > > For a FedEx day project, one of the Confluence guys created a plugin > > > > that allowed you to clone/tag/branch a space. We might want to do the > > > > same if new branches significantly differ from the previous. > > > > > > > > http://blogs.atlassian.com/developer/2007/05/fedex_v_copy_space_plugin.html > > > > > > > > Don > > > > > > > > On 8/2/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> That's probably not a good idea, as the ajax-related tags changed > > > >> quite a bit on 2.1 now the documentation is pointing to them. > > > >> > > > >> musachy > > > >> > > > >> On 8/2/07, Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>> Actual value is > > > >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/struts2/trunk/core/src/site/resources/tags/ > > > >>> > > > >>> Musachy Barroso schrieb: > > > >>>> is the "struts2-tags" cwiki variable pointing to svn trunk or the > > > >>>> branch? > > > >>>> > > > >>>> musachy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
