The notion is that Struts and other projects could build their own implementations based on the specification, the same way different groups build components based on the JSON-RPC specification. So, no, we wouldn't put our own implementation on the Google Code site.
-Ted. On Nov 1, 2007 9:59 AM, Tom Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looks good to me. I was going to suggest putting this on the wiki, > but a googlecode project is even better. So would the code for this > new struts2 plugin live here or in the struts codebase? > > > On 11/1/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just to followup, I setup a Google Code site as a place to describe > > and design cross-platform technologies that pertain to web application > > development and deployment. For some time now, I've spent half my time > > working in .NET, which probably won't change for another year or two, > > and so working on cross-platform technologies is of great interest to > > me. > > > > I've extended the initial draft posted here to include the action URI > > to Action Class mappings. While based on SmartURLs and CodeBehind, the > > description goes beyond what either can do right now. > > > > * http://code.google.com/p/web-alignment-group/wiki/WAG_RFC_001 > > > > Before doing any more work on the description, I'd be very interested > > on feedback as to whether I'm making any sense, or whether the draft > > has turned into opaque gibberish :) > > > > -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
