Don Brown wrote:
On 11/2/07, Brian Pontarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
First, just wanted to cover the plan quick. I was planning on merging
the SmartURLs code into the existing codebehind plugin tomorrow and
ensuring everything is correctly in the new packages and that the old
annotations are correctly deprecated. Is this still how we want to move
forward?
I think this is a great case where we need a tech spec before merging
the code. The spec should cover the problem, use cases, proposed
solution, and implementation details. The document ted put together
is a good start for the general approach, but this spec would be more
focused on exactly how the codebehind plugin would change and why.
I can start working on the specifics with respect to the current
functionality in SmartURLs and the proposals that are on the table and
gear it specifically at the new plugin.
We all have different ideas how the codebehind plugin will work and
why, and a tech spec will help focus this discussion, and serve as
useful documentation later.
I think we might have slightly different ideas, but in general I imagine
everyone is pretty much inline and flexible enough to accept ideas from
others. I'll bang out the spec today and tomorrow and then see where we
are at. I'll put that in a wiki page over at the SmartURLs and build on
the abstraction that Ted started.
Don
-bp
Don
-bp ;)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
