No it doesn't, but then neither does the Struts tags if "no OGNL"  :)

On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Adam Hardy <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Really??? I don't think jsp:getProperty does conversion and formatting -
> does it?
>
> James Mitchell on 20/03/08 16:49, wrote:
> > Actually, and not trying to be funny here, but ... that's available
> today...
> >
> > <jsp:getProperty name="myBean" property="foo"/>
> >
> > http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/tags/11/tags11.html
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Adam Hardy <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> in fact, i'd write a new taglibrary with just lightweight support for
> form
> >> properties, conversion, and formatting. No HTML, no Ajax, no OGNL, no
> >> value stack.
> >>
> >> Then I'd do a session of performance testing to see what the
> improvement
> >> was
> >> (did somebody else suggest that?).
> >>
> >>
> >> Antonio Petrelli on 20/03/08 07:54, wrote:
> >>> Just one item:
> >>> - allow the use of JSTL, instead of special tags.
> >>> If it is already possible, well, forgive me :-)
> >>>
> >>> Antonio
> >>>
> >>> 2008/3/20, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>>> My list;
> >>>>
> >>>> - Overhaul the AJAX plugins so that we're up to date on dojo and we
> >> have a
> >>>> framework for adding other AJAX library plug-ins whilst maintaining a
> >> core
> >>>> tag set.
> >>>> - Overhaul message passing so that action errors and action messages
> >> could
> >>>> be persisted through redirects with no user configuration or
> validation
> >>>> issues.
> >>>> - Overhaul zero configuration to allow results to be defined at
> method
> >>>> level
> >>>> - Complete the move to Generics.
> >>>> - Thrash the framework through a profiler to look for optimization
> >>>> opportunities.
> >>>> - and with the spare time; build a school in a third work country :).
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Al.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>> From: "Jeromy Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>> To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
> >>>> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 7:08 AM
> >>>> Subject: If I had 1000 hours to give...
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> It's been quiet lately so I thought I'd throw something out there.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If you could give 1000 hours to the Struts 2 project, what would you
> >> do?
> >>>>> I would like to it become the SOA framework of choice through :
> >>>>> - SEO-friendly URLs become the default and users never have to think
> >>>> about
> >>>>> it again;
> >>>>> - allow action methods to be bound to an http method and allow
> results
> >>>> to
> >>>>> be easily bound to the result code and requested content type (as
> per
> >>>> REST
> >>>>> plugin)
> >>>>> - support content in the request (eg text/xml or text/json
> >>>> content-type),
> >>>>> deserialize and set the model of the action (the reverse of the REST
> >>>>> plugin)
> >>>>> - allow actions to be pojos and delete ActionSupport (without losing
> >>>>> implicit i18n and validation functionality)
> >>>>> - allow hot deployment & run-time management of actions (OSGi??)
> >>>>> - refactor UIBean & XWork component so there's only one model and
> one
> >>>>> template per tag and they're easy to unit test (code-generate the
> >>>>> wrappers/template models/taglibs)
> >>>>> - action scope and component scope become first-class concepts
> >>>> (integrate
> >>>>> the plugins)
> >>>>> - add run-time developer tools; configuration browser becomes
> standard
> >>>> in
> >>>>> developer mode and add a resource bundle browser
> >>>>> - delete all ajax-like tags and funky tags; add standard
> interceptors
> >> &
> >>>>> models to ease integration with the client-side libraries, groovy,
> >>>> grails,
> >>>>> JSF, struts1 (and others?). tags move to plugin.
> >>>>> - I don't have an opinion about portal support but I'm sure it's
> >>>> important
> >>>>> I think I ran out of hours already!
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-- 
James Mitchell

Reply via email to