Really??? I don't think jsp:getProperty does conversion and formatting -
does it?
James Mitchell on 20/03/08 16:49, wrote:
> Actually, and not trying to be funny here, but ... that's available
today...
>
> <jsp:getProperty name="myBean" property="foo"/>
>
> http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/tags/11/tags11.html
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Adam Hardy <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> in fact, i'd write a new taglibrary with just lightweight support for
form
>> properties, conversion, and formatting. No HTML, no Ajax, no OGNL, no
>> value stack.
>>
>> Then I'd do a session of performance testing to see what the
improvement
>> was
>> (did somebody else suggest that?).
>>
>>
>> Antonio Petrelli on 20/03/08 07:54, wrote:
>>> Just one item:
>>> - allow the use of JSTL, instead of special tags.
>>> If it is already possible, well, forgive me :-)
>>>
>>> Antonio
>>>
>>> 2008/3/20, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>> My list;
>>>>
>>>> - Overhaul the AJAX plugins so that we're up to date on dojo and we
>> have a
>>>> framework for adding other AJAX library plug-ins whilst maintaining
>>>> a
>> core
>>>> tag set.
>>>> - Overhaul message passing so that action errors and action messages
>> could
>>>> be persisted through redirects with no user configuration or
validation
>>>> issues.
>>>> - Overhaul zero configuration to allow results to be defined at
method
>>>> level
>>>> - Complete the move to Generics.
>>>> - Thrash the framework through a profiler to look for optimization
>>>> opportunities.
>>>> - and with the spare time; build a school in a third work country
>>>> :).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Al.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Jeromy Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 7:08 AM
>>>> Subject: If I had 1000 hours to give...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> It's been quiet lately so I thought I'd throw something out there.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you could give 1000 hours to the Struts 2 project, what would
>>>>> you
>> do?
>>>>> I would like to it become the SOA framework of choice through :
>>>>> - SEO-friendly URLs become the default and users never have to
>>>>> think
>>>> about
>>>>> it again;
>>>>> - allow action methods to be bound to an http method and allow
results
>>>> to
>>>>> be easily bound to the result code and requested content type (as
per
>>>> REST
>>>>> plugin)
>>>>> - support content in the request (eg text/xml or text/json
>>>> content-type),
>>>>> deserialize and set the model of the action (the reverse of the
>>>>> REST
>>>>> plugin)
>>>>> - allow actions to be pojos and delete ActionSupport (without
>>>>> losing
>>>>> implicit i18n and validation functionality)
>>>>> - allow hot deployment & run-time management of actions (OSGi??)
>>>>> - refactor UIBean & XWork component so there's only one model and
one
>>>>> template per tag and they're easy to unit test (code-generate the
>>>>> wrappers/template models/taglibs)
>>>>> - action scope and component scope become first-class concepts
>>>> (integrate
>>>>> the plugins)
>>>>> - add run-time developer tools; configuration browser becomes
standard
>>>> in
>>>>> developer mode and add a resource bundle browser
>>>>> - delete all ajax-like tags and funky tags; add standard
interceptors
>> &
>>>>> models to ease integration with the client-side libraries, groovy,
>>>> grails,
>>>>> JSF, struts1 (and others?). tags move to plugin.
>>>>> - I don't have an opinion about portal support but I'm sure it's
>>>> important
>>>>> I think I ran out of hours already!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
