FWIW, I am also against the name "convention" plugin. Conventions change
over time, and I don't think any one plugin should be "the" convention. I'd
like to have a name that explains the intent behind the convention. That's
why names like Zero Config or REST are much more affable.

Paul

On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I will take a look at the migration of the REST plugin. But I don't
> see the point of supporting codebehind from convention, as they are
> separate plugins, users can choose any one they like, we are just
> saying that "convention" is the recommended one, and there won't be
> more development on codebehind.
>
> If we want just one plugin, that supports both (playing with that idea
> now), that would keep backward compatibility but it would be even more
> confusing.
>
> musachy
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:43 AM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Has any work been done to support existing zero config applications
> > with this new plugin?  If not, I'd kinda consider that a blocker (-1)
> > because a sufficiently flexible configuration system should be able to
> > support multiple conventions.  Also, someone will have to sign up to
> > convert the REST plugin, which currently depends on the codebehind
> > plugin.
> >
> > If backwards-compatibility and REST plugin migration are resolved, I'd
> vote +0
> >
> > Don
> >
> > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> With the addition of @IntereceptorRefs to the Convention plugin, it is
> >>  now possible to do most of the action mapping using annotations. Also
> >>  having 2 plugins to do the same thing is really confusing for users,
> >>  so we should deprecate Zero Config (good thing is that it was always
> >>  "experimental").
> >>
> >>  If you have had a chance to look at the Convention plugin, please vote:
> >>
> >>  [+1] Move the Convention plugin to trunk and deprecate Zero
> Configuration plugin
> >>  [-1] Leave it in sandbox. (reasons?)
> >>
> >>
> >>  regards
> >>  musachy
> >>  --
> >>  "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> >>
> >>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to