I too would like to commend Musachy for timely and concentrated effort with
regards to this plugin :)
Are there any objections to merging these plugins? Does the REST plugin
embody a set of conventions on urls alone, or does it go deeper than that?
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Musachy Barroso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 7:48 PM
To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bring Convention plugin into trunk and deprecate Zero
Config
Indeed :). I don't see why we shouldn't.
musachy
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
It appears you're making the argument for combining these plugins. :-) +1
to
that.
Paul
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Looking at the rest plugin, something doesn't feel right. Doesn't the
dependency between REST and Codebehind looks wrong? From
http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/plugins.html
"Plugins are not loaded in any particular order. Plugins should not
have dependencies on each other. A plugin may depend on classes
provided by Struts Core, but it should not depend on classes loaded by
another plugin."
musachy
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:43 AM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has any work been done to support existing zero config applications
> with this new plugin? If not, I'd kinda consider that a blocker (-1)
> because a sufficiently flexible configuration system should be able to
> support multiple conventions. Also, someone will have to sign up to
> convert the REST plugin, which currently depends on the codebehind
> plugin.
>
> If backwards-compatibility and REST plugin migration are resolved, I'd
vote +0
>
> Don
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> With the addition of @IntereceptorRefs to the Convention plugin, it
>> is
>> now possible to do most of the action mapping using annotations.
>> Also
>> having 2 plugins to do the same thing is really confusing for users,
>> so we should deprecate Zero Config (good thing is that it was always
>> "experimental").
>>
>> If you have had a chance to look at the Convention plugin, please
>> vote:
>>
>> [+1] Move the Convention plugin to trunk and deprecate Zero
Configuration plugin
>> [-1] Leave it in sandbox. (reasons?)
>>
>>
>> regards
>> musachy
>> --
>> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>>
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
