It turns out that making codebehind work from convention is quite easy
(DI FTW!), but again, I think this would be a bad choice.

musachy

On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will take a look at the migration of the REST plugin. But I don't
> see the point of supporting codebehind from convention, as they are
> separate plugins, users can choose any one they like, we are just
> saying that "convention" is the recommended one, and there won't be
> more development on codebehind.
>
> If we want just one plugin, that supports both (playing with that idea
> now), that would keep backward compatibility but it would be even more
> confusing.
>
> musachy
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:43 AM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Has any work been done to support existing zero config applications
>> with this new plugin?  If not, I'd kinda consider that a blocker (-1)
>> because a sufficiently flexible configuration system should be able to
>> support multiple conventions.  Also, someone will have to sign up to
>> convert the REST plugin, which currently depends on the codebehind
>> plugin.
>>
>> If backwards-compatibility and REST plugin migration are resolved, I'd vote 
>> +0
>>
>> Don
>>
>> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> With the addition of @IntereceptorRefs to the Convention plugin, it is
>>>  now possible to do most of the action mapping using annotations. Also
>>>  having 2 plugins to do the same thing is really confusing for users,
>>>  so we should deprecate Zero Config (good thing is that it was always
>>>  "experimental").
>>>
>>>  If you have had a chance to look at the Convention plugin, please vote:
>>>
>>>  [+1] Move the Convention plugin to trunk and deprecate Zero Configuration 
>>> plugin
>>>  [-1] Leave it in sandbox. (reasons?)
>>>
>>>
>>>  regards
>>>  musachy
>>>  --
>>>  "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>>>
>>>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>



-- 
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to