On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Bob Tiernay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone really looked into a comparison between using a taglib vs. a raw > javascript framework across these dimensions: Hey, don't look at me - I gave up using server-side rendering years ago! ;-) -- Martin Cooper > 1. Performance (page load time / bandwidth) (think s:head across most > pages) > 2. Expressiveness > 3. Unobtrusiveness > 4. Maintainability > 5. Understandability > 6. Modularity > > My experience has been that all of these are enhanced when using the later. > I really don't see why even a taglib is even on the table. Perhaps I'm > missing something here, but what is to be gained by unifying javascript > libraries with a taglib façade? This smells of commons logging. > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 7:36 PM > To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Deprecate or remove Dojo plugin > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Dojo seems to get the most lip service, but I've seen persistence >>> reports that YUI has broader acceptance. >>> >> >> >> The thing is, it depends a whole lot on what you are doing with it. >> >> For example, the people I know who are developing rich client-side apps >> with >> JavaScript are using Ext JS or Dojo. None of them are using YUI because >> YUI >> simply isn't appropriate, or complete enough, for that kind of usage. It's >> perfectly fine, though, if what you want is to add some AJAXy capabilities >> to a more traditional web app. >> >> As another example, there are certainly plenty of people building point >> applications with Prototype and its friends, but if you're building >> something that needs to be extensible and include components from >> elsewhere, >> you almost certainly don't want to be using a framework that messes with >> core JavaScript types. >> >> -- >> Martin Cooper >> >> >> >>> -Ted. >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> > --- On Tue, 7/22/08, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >> Isn't Dojo the defacto ajax standard on the web? >>> > >>> > In terms of deployments I'd put money on Prototype and/or jQuery. Not >>> that it's a large sample size, but I don't know *anybody* using Dojo >>> outside >>> of S2. >>> > >>> > Dave >>> > >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> HTH, Ted >>> http://husted.com/ted/blog/ >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
