I'd suggest that we put a replacement together before pulling the Dojo plugin out of the distribution (I can help). We could at least deprecate Dojo in the meantime.
-T. On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So is the consensus so far that we should have a few, very simple > tags, based on another framework, and take the dojo plugin out of > struts? > > musachy > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:20 AM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> One solution would be to provide the backing components for simple use-cases >> (like <sx:a...> and <sx:submit...> at least) and an integration with a >> couple JavaScript libraries, hopefully making it obvious enough that people >> could then implement their own back-end. >> >> With simple components updating on backing library updates is easier, and >> (in theory) it makes it easier to understand how users can extend or create >> additional tags to suit their needs. >> >> So I vote +1 for removing the existing Dojo plugin (+0 for deprecating) and >> +1 for creating the simplistic components and example integrations. >> >> Dave >> >> --- On Tue, 7/22/08, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> From: Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Deprecate or remove Dojo plugin >>> To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org> >>> Date: Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 9:34 AM >>> I think Dave also had a JQuery plugin somewhere, isn't >>> that right? >>> >>> musachy >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 7:49 AM, alvins >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > >>> > +1 to remove. >>> > >>> > Valid points raised by all. I personally use JQuery in >>> my daily life and >>> > have written my own tags to do these functions. I did >>> previously look at the >>> > effort required to update the current tags to the >>> latest dojo but it would >>> > be very time consuming and far easier to start from >>> scratch. I think a >>> > large problem with the current dojo tags are that it >>> is very complicated to >>> > do simple things (dojo itself is complicated >>> relatively). >>> > >>> > With JQuery it is quite easy to do most of the things >>> mentioned so am not >>> > sure on the benefits of tags. That said - if you made >>> the tags powerful >>> > enough - they can be quite useful in a large number of >>> cases - however the >>> > flipside is as you add functionality, maintainability >>> becomes an issue. >>> > >>> > btw. If anybody is interested in some JQuery tags I >>> could start a plugin..? >>> > -- >>> > View this message in context: >>> http://www.nabble.com/-PROPOSAL--Deprecate-or-remove-Dojo-plugin-tp18573704p18587222.html >>> > Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at >>> Nabble.com. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" >>> Pink Floyd >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- HTH, Ted http://husted.com/ted/blog/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
