So is the consensus so far that we should have a few, very simple
tags, based on another framework, and take the dojo plugin out of
struts?

musachy

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:20 AM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One solution would be to provide the backing components for simple use-cases 
> (like <sx:a...> and <sx:submit...> at least) and an integration with a couple 
> JavaScript libraries, hopefully making it obvious enough that people could 
> then implement their own back-end.
>
> With simple components updating on backing library updates is easier, and (in 
> theory) it makes it easier to understand how users can extend or create 
> additional tags to suit their needs.
>
> So I vote +1 for removing the existing Dojo plugin (+0 for deprecating) and 
> +1 for creating the simplistic components and example integrations.
>
> Dave
>
> --- On Tue, 7/22/08, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> From: Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Deprecate or remove Dojo plugin
>> To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
>> Date: Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 9:34 AM
>> I think Dave also had a JQuery plugin somewhere, isn't
>> that right?
>>
>> musachy
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 7:49 AM, alvins
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 to remove.
>> >
>> > Valid points raised by all. I personally use JQuery in
>> my daily life and
>> > have written my own tags to do these functions. I did
>> previously look at the
>> > effort required to update the current tags to the
>> latest dojo but it would
>> > be very time consuming and far easier to start from
>> scratch.  I think a
>> > large problem with the current dojo tags are that it
>> is very complicated to
>> > do simple things (dojo itself is complicated
>> relatively).
>> >
>> > With JQuery it is quite easy to do most of the things
>> mentioned so am not
>> > sure on the benefits of tags. That said - if you made
>> the tags powerful
>> > enough - they can be quite useful in a large number of
>> cases - however the
>> > flipside is as you add functionality, maintainability
>> becomes an issue.
>> >
>> > btw. If anybody is interested in some JQuery tags I
>> could start a plugin..?
>> > --
>> > View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/-PROPOSAL--Deprecate-or-remove-Dojo-plugin-tp18573704p18587222.html
>> > Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at
>> Nabble.com.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?"
>> Pink Floyd
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



-- 
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to