On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara <mcucchi...@apache.org>wrote:
> I'm also for standardizing, but this time I'm not sure how this fits with > the whole architecture. > XWork is able to work without Struts, and Struts depends on XWork. So make > XW aware of S2 is a kind of circular dependency. > Good point. That slipped my mind for a moment. > I'd rather prefer to make the property names plain (ex: struts.devMode -> > devMode) > > Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara > G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 > Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara > > Maurizio Cucchiara > > > On 21 March 2012 09:07, Philip Luppens <philip.lupp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2012/3/21 Łukasz Lenart <lukasz.len...@googlemail.com> > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I just notice that S2 and XWork use the sam properties but under > > > different names, eg. struts.devMode (S2) and devMode (XW). What about > > > inline them and use just struts.* ? > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > -- > > > Łukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > > mobile +48 606 323 122, office +27 11 0838747 > > > Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > > > > > > > I'm all for standardizing - so +1 for the struts.* approach. > > > > -Phil > > > > -- > > "We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand." - > > Randy Pausch > > > -- "We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand." - Randy Pausch
