On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm also for standardizing, but this time I'm not sure how this fits with > the whole architecture. > XWork is able to work without Struts, and Struts depends on XWork. So make > XW aware of S2 is a kind of circular dependency. > I'd rather prefer to make the property names plain (ex: struts.devMode -> > devMode)
+1 I have recently learned in another context that one might use XWork without Struts. This is pretty interesting option, but to my taste it is not highlighted very much. Not sure if that makes sense? > > Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara > G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 > Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara > > Maurizio Cucchiara > > > On 21 March 2012 09:07, Philip Luppens <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 2012/3/21 Łukasz Lenart <[email protected]> >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I just notice that S2 and XWork use the sam properties but under >> > different names, eg. struts.devMode (S2) and devMode (XW). What about >> > inline them and use just struts.* ? >> > >> > >> > Regards >> > -- >> > Łukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >> > mobile +48 606 323 122, office +27 11 0838747 >> > Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> > >> I'm all for standardizing - so +1 for the struts.* approach. >> >> -Phil >> >> -- >> "We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand." - >> Randy Pausch >> -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
