Being smaller than Spring Boot is a pretty low bar ;) But interesting--I actually would have guessed both would be more resource-intensive; I'm clearly behind-the-times.
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 5:18 AM Johannes Geppert <jo...@apache.org> wrote: > In my first tests it looks like Struts2 is not to heavy to run as a lambda > function. > In fact the bundled jar is smaller than a similar Spring Boot version and > the used memory is lower as well. > > See my small comparison between these both serverless solutions: > > https://www.jgeppert.com/2018/05/serverless-aws-lambda-performance-of-apache-struts2-vs-spring-boot/ > > Best Regards > > Johannes > > > > > >> Thank you. I need to explore into uSvcs to reveal if S2 need to/can be > > >> used in such trends e.g. clouds. > > >> > > > > > >"Clouds" are just servers-not-on-site. It's too heavy for serverless > > (IMO, at least > > >as it stands right now), and it can already be deployed on any > reasonable > > >infrastructure. > > > > Fortunately I discovered there is already a cloud plugin for Struts [1]. > > > > Regards. > > > -- em: davelnew...@gmail.com mo: 908-380-8699 tw: @dave_newton <https://twitter.com/dave_newton> li: dave-newton <https://www.linkedin.com/in/dave-newton/> gh: davelnewton <https://github.com/davelnewton> so: Dave Newton <http://stackoverflow.com/users/438992/dave-newton> bl: Bucky Bits <http://buckybits.blogspot.com/> sk: davelnewton_skype
