On 12/5/2018 5:58 PM, Dave Newton wrote: > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 4:37 AM Yasser Zamani <yasserzam...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> I found dagger2 best when there are limited resources and we need an >> urgent performance e.g. in mobile devices. But Struts unfortunately is not >> able to be used in mobile app developments so we can postpone dagger 2 to >> when Struts will be able. >> > > Dagger seems to be cross-platform; no reason it couldn't be used in a POJ > project, but as you say, it seems a replacement for, not an adjunct to, > existing DI engines. We could consider using it for internal injection > rather than the original Guice, and allowing users to use it, but... I > don't know. Would have to think about that and spin some PoCs.
Yes I agree. S2's internal injection cycles aren't still obvious for me enough but why not. To compete performance we should devise to reform to best current DI tool when is applicable. > > I don't see any reason to (or even a reasonable ability to) target S2 at > mobile. > +1 Instead we may focus to facilitate "show mobile version of user web app". I don't know if S2 already have such facilities e.g. via Tiles or SiteMesh plugin. > >> @dev wdyt? I thought what about add integration with front-end trends e.g. >> React, Angular, Vu.js, Node.js? > > > NodeJS isn't really front-end. > > I don't know what would be added to S2 to "integrate" it into a front end; > it already does JSON reasonably well-ish. Web socket support would be about > the only thing "missing" in this regard. > Thank you. "Web socket support" recorded :) I also currently have no vision on those front-end trends, am exploring. To be frank, something similar to Struts JQuery Plugin was my first theory, however, it may be absurd. > >> and improve Struts internals with concept trends e.g. microservices, DIs >> and etc? > > > IMO w/o some major gutting S2 won't be a (good) microservice framework. > uSvcs are more single-function endpoints, while S2 is meant for a > collection of endpoints. We could consider Java-based config (again/still) > and but I'm not 100% sure what that buys the framework overall. > Thank you. I need to explore into uSvcs to reveal if S2 need to/can be used in such trends e.g. clouds. > I should poke around a bit in the Java world again and re-familiarize > myself with some S2 internals before saying too much, though :/ Thank you very much! As a prominent S2's member, with your advises S2 can excel and excel day by day :) Kind regards.
