Philip Martin wrote: > Daniel Näslund <dan...@longitudo.com> writes: > > > When updating to loose an external the code should handle a locally > > missing externals item.
I edited that part of the log message to make clear what the patch is for: [[[ When updating to lose an external, the code should handle a locally missing externals item, and it does. Add a test for this in an existing test case. ]]] - Julian > > * subversion/tests/cmdline/externals_tests.py > > (update_loose_external): Remove one externals wc dir. > > ]]] > > > > I'm writing a patch to remove some adm_access batons. That patch made > > the externals_tests even though it didn't handle missing local > > externals which trunk does. > > I don't understand that last sentence, did you miss out a word, pass > or fail perhaps? > > Anyway, it's a sensible extension to the test. r887867, thanks! > >
