On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 18:51, John Beranek <j...@redux.org.uk> wrote: > On 28/03/2011 23:45, Greg Stein wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 17:42, John Beranek <j...@redux.org.uk> wrote: >>> On 25/03/2011 17:33, Mark Phippard wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I have been working on a framework for writing tests to record >>>> performance. I have something good enough to share: >>> >>> May I make an observation about these benchmarks...? >>> >>> When I provided some benchmarks that included 'checkout' tests I was >>> specifically asked to make tests that separate WC and RA functionality. >>> >>> I did this, released results, and the (portable) benchmark code. >>> >>> Now Mark has released a new set of benchmarks, which don't separate WC >>> and RA functionality. No one has (yet) noted this fact. ;) >> >> I think your benchmarks are going to be more helpful for us to locate >> hotspots and get them fixed. Mark's seem more high-level, for >> policy-making rather than coding. >> >> Did your benchmark scripts get checked in? (I've been out a couple >> weeks and may have missed that) And whether they did or not, would you >> want commit access to get them committed, and/or continue work on them >> within the svn repository? > > I checked them into a Git repository, both for ease of repository > creation, and for ease of cloning. Of course, hosting SVN tools in Git > may be seen as sacrilegious by some... ;)
Heh. I certainly don't mind. They just aren't going to get a lot of attention outside of our own repository, I think. At a minimum, what's the URL? Cheers, -g
