Forgot to add: this was with the repository via svnserve on localhost. Johan
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Johan Corveleyn <jcor...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Here is another data point, for my old (t)rusty Windows XP (32-bit) > this time, on a system with a pretty slow hard disk (5.4k rpm), 1.83 > GHz Intel T2400 cpu, 3 GB RAM. > > I must say the results look very good for 1.7 (r1086021) compared to > 1.6.16 on this system. Especially for the "Folder tests" and the > "Binaries tests" (rather: you can see how much it hurts sometimes to > use 1.6.x on this kind of system, when working with working copies > with lots of folders). Apart from "Bin-commit" and "Bin-rm", I can't > see a significant performance degradation within your test-suite on my > system. > > Both test runs were run with antivirus enabled (AVG free). I also did > a run of 1.7 with AV disabled, but it made no significant difference. > I rebooted between each test run just to be sure about disk caching > effects. > > Oh, and I made my 1.7 build with "Release" configuration. At least on > Windows, I know there is a significant performance difference between > "Debug" builds and "Release" builds (that became clear during my > perf-work on "svn diff"). Best to compare release builds with release > builds, I think... > > Cheers, > -- > Johan >
