On 29/03/11 01:33, Greg Stein wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 18:51, John Beranek <j...@redux.org.uk> wrote: >> On 28/03/2011 23:45, Greg Stein wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 17:42, John Beranek <j...@redux.org.uk> wrote: >>>> On 25/03/2011 17:33, Mark Phippard wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I have been working on a framework for writing tests to record >>>>> performance. I have something good enough to share: >>>> >>>> May I make an observation about these benchmarks...? >>>> >>>> When I provided some benchmarks that included 'checkout' tests I was >>>> specifically asked to make tests that separate WC and RA functionality. >>>> >>>> I did this, released results, and the (portable) benchmark code. >>>> >>>> Now Mark has released a new set of benchmarks, which don't separate WC >>>> and RA functionality. No one has (yet) noted this fact. ;) >>> >>> I think your benchmarks are going to be more helpful for us to locate >>> hotspots and get them fixed. Mark's seem more high-level, for >>> policy-making rather than coding. >>> >>> Did your benchmark scripts get checked in? (I've been out a couple >>> weeks and may have missed that) And whether they did or not, would you >>> want commit access to get them committed, and/or continue work on them >>> within the svn repository? >> >> I checked them into a Git repository, both for ease of repository >> creation, and for ease of cloning. Of course, hosting SVN tools in Git >> may be seen as sacrilegious by some... ;) > > Heh. I certainly don't mind. They just aren't going to get a lot of > attention outside of our own repository, I think. > > At a minimum, what's the URL?
https://github.com/jberanek/svn_scripts I'm certainly not averse to putting the script into the SVN repository if anyone thinks it's worthwhile though. I think I'd need to at least add some usage information before doing so. Cheers, John. -- John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot. http://redux.org.uk/ -- William Blake
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
