On 07.04.2011 17:19, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
"Review of performance branch": I get the sense from the list traffic that we've kinda pulled what we want from this branch into trunk for now. Can someone confirm?
Someone can and I do ;) The remaining 20% of the patches on the performance branch are not 1.7 material.
"API performance analysis": We're doing some amount of this right now, though more at the operational level than at the API level. This is where I see value in hearing from our third-party API consumers/friends. We sorta put Stefan King on hold for a while while we were dinking around at higher levels in WC-NG. Would others agree that at this point, we're a bit more free to start soliciting (and responding to) performance evaluations from the likes of TortoiseSVN, AnkhSVN, subclipse, etc.?
As a TSVN developer and user: +1 on that.
-- Stefan^2.
