On 04/09/2011 07:29 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > On 07.04.2011 17:19, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> "Review of performance branch": I get the sense from the list traffic that >> we've kinda pulled what we want from this branch into trunk for now. Can >> someone confirm? > > Someone can and I do ;) The remaining 20% of the patches > on the performance branch are not 1.7 material.
Thanks. I've marked this item "Completed" on the Roadmap page. >> "API performance analysis": We're doing some amount of this right now, >> though more at the operational level than at the API level. This is where I >> see value in hearing from our third-party API consumers/friends. We sorta >> put Stefan King on hold for a while while we were dinking around at higher >> levels in WC-NG. Would others agree that at this point, we're a bit more >> free to start soliciting (and responding to) performance evaluations from >> the likes of TortoiseSVN, AnkhSVN, subclipse, etc.? > > As a TSVN developer and user: +1 on that. Great. Then, as a TSVN developer, we look forward to hearing your feedback and suggestions on API performance. :-) -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
